Not known Facts About Dr. Adil Baguirov Wikipedia

The fact is this kind of verse won't exist! Else Mr. Baguirov present us the first verse in Persian. Any more we must always desire MR. Baguirov to utilize the first Persian verse as Nizami Ganjavi didn't communicate Turkic! As per the absolute the vast majority of resources, once again on this subject of interpretation of this verse, if this kind of Wrong translation on the Persian was produced by the USSR scholar, then their belief has no benefit. Indeed Nizami Ganjavi won't make use of the word Apaq even at the time While Persian has p.

The film presumably will likely be known as ‘The large Game’ or ‘The Oil Wars’ and will underline which the Baku oil has always been in the focus of Worldwide consideration, becoming “an award” which superpowers were being endeavoring to achieve.

Considering that Mr. Doostzadeh continuously shows absence of knowledge and comprehension of Nizami’s poetry – Hence proving Having said that Nafisi was right together with his quotation to academician Marr – and promises, probably only because of his anti-Azerbaijani, anti-Turkic racism – that “everyone knows Shirin was Christian [and thus had to be Armenian]”, below’s an interesting passage within the poem (the verse’s above, together with subsequent a single’s, now proved that Shirin and her aunt Mihin-Banu simply couldn't have been Armenian (despite processing Armenia to be a vassal territory) and had been Arranian (Azerbaijani) and Turkic, for this reason now I will likely display that Shirin was not Christian).

And getting your regular unfounded argument,Because he didn't consider Kurdish, it doesn't mean he wasn't Kurdish and did not know its folklore! The chain of unfortunate absurd arguments never ever ends, but in the end of it, it won't ever make Nizami more/lower than what is known about him nowadays. The Educational Marr Incidentally was originally a very good scholar, but his later otheories were Psuedo-Scholarly as everybody knows. Also with Stalins interference in ethnic issues, just one has no choice but to jot down the party line. That is why the theories of your USSR about Nizami ended up debunked all-around 1988 and that's why you return to Students that experienced no preference during the USSR era and needed to follow Stalins traces and might not think of even solitary Professor in Persian literature in A significant College from the West to backup your claim. In which as I can. Also Said Nafisi, in his ebook Babak Delawar-e-Azarbaijan Obviously states the Turkic Oghuz language befell afterwards and Babak was Persian (Pahlavi speaker). Furthermore in describing Nizamis father, he would not say everything about ethnicity and constatly refers to Nizami as an Iranian poet and absolutely nothing about currently being an Azarbaijani poet or in any case relevant to Azarbaijani Oghuz Turks!

Most would say present Superintendent Rhonda Corr was his hand picked protegee (Or possibly far more properly, lover in crime).

Mr. Doostzadeh’s excuse that “Incidentally when judging a Individuals ethnicity, we do not use twelfth century time, but the trendy time, the place each female and male lineage are essential” is shaky and Bizarre. Except Iran and Azerbaijan have modified right away in modern day periods, the society and tradition in All those nations prescribe that nationality passes by means of father, not mom.

The fact is that the quotations of 1950's scholar below Stalin has no tutorial worth in comparison to the lastest statements of fantastic scholars. Also I usually do not intend to make this a struggle about Nizamis ethnicity, but it should be about Nizami and his perform. But I can seek out Armenians who talk Russian and would aid me dig up each of the statements with regards to Nizami in that journal and other journal near to the breakup. Also Ibn Howqal has Plainly described no Turkic in Armenia and Arran and his time is near Nizamis. So is definitely the ebook Hodood-al-Alam.

By no means I am heading to simply accept that he was fifty percent Oghuz Turkic, if the frustrating evidence indicates usually and Western scholars haven't described this either and neither did any historians and biographers with the old ages that wrote about Nizami.

fifteen) I don’t care what search results from Google will yield vis-à-vis Shirin – I’ve now stated pretty clearly that she couldn't are actually Armenian, and was Obviously Azerbaijani (Arrani) Turk. And her title in Azerbaijani, as opposed to in Armenian, also signifies “sweet” just as in Persian. Such as, Armenian (!) professional on Nizami, M.Shaginyan dismissed the mistaken assumption of Shirin staying Armenian – I possess the page from her book scanned, just in the event that anyone doesn’t imagine. How badly educated 1 needs to be to say that Shirin was Armenian if she just travelled (i.e, not lived!) to Armenia, a geographic idea to begin with as there was no unbiased Armenia either in Nizami's time or in Khosrov time.

When Mr. Doostzadeh is completely cornered and out of arguments, he statements that “the general plan of wikipedia is to make use of what The latest scholars think about Nizami and not Students from fifty yrs back from USSR.

About the view of Turks as just and reasonable people today that Mr. Doostzadeh tries to oppose, allow us to have Nizami speak for himself Once more (I’ve furnished this quote just before but determined by comparable Soviet translation) – and without any likelihood of mistranslation and misunderstanding as what plagues Doostzadeh’s commentary:

Moreover, the “Albans” had been by no means an ethnos during the rigid sense – they had been a country, like Iranians or Azerbaijanis or Georgians or Russians – which bundled a number of other ethnic teams, in actual fact, In line with Strabo, 26 different ethnic teams, speaking distinct languages instead of understanding each other.

An additional Fake assert of Mr. Baguirov: Ferdowsi was purchased Shahnameh by a Turk, as was the situation with a number of other non-Turkic poets. . This statement is false nowadays (had Mr. Baguirov read through any of the recent scholarship of Ferdowsi including that by Dr. Khaleghi Motlaq). Certainly Ferdowsi commenced his get the job done throughout the Samanid era. How many unsubstantiated promises is Mr. Baguirov going to make? He then carries on: It was a Turk who ordered the poem, it had been him who, Regardless of the not really favorable language, compensated for it, and it had been him who purchased to transcribe it on a lot of manuscripts and so put it aside for the longer term generations Once again repeateding the identical assertion with no undertaking any investigate!

Academician Marr was an awesome historian and Orientalist, and if he wrote that Said Nafisi told him (amongst other Iranian poets) about Nizami in have a peek at these guys 1925 (Marr’s book I have Using the estimate I have from was revealed in 1939), then I definitely believe him. Marr states lots of far more text with regards to the destructive response to Nizami and Khagani from Persian intelligentsia in Iran – he also experienced discussions with “king of poets” Melek osh-Shoera and fantastic-grandson with the famous Kaem Mekam regarding the destructive attitudes in the direction of Nizami in Iran.